Free proposal checks open soon. Get notified →

HOW IT WORKS

A clear path.
A human decision.

Four deliberate stages from offer selection to accountable release.

CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE

Evidence in.
Accountable decisions out.

One connected reasoning system.
Your team's judgment at the center of every commitment.

Illustrative flow

01 / INPUTS

Proposal draftClaims + commitments
RFP + evidenceSupporting source material
Review rulesThe standard for this review

Judgment Layer

Reasoning core

Trace the claim. Test the support.
Understand what changes.

Source linking
Conflict detection
Consequence analysis
Recommended changes
Evidence stays attached to the reasoning

03 / OUTPUTS

Review findingsGaps, conflicts + support
Customer decisionsAccept / Edit / Decline / Leave open
Traceable recordSource, version + decision
CROSS-CUTTING FOUNDATION · DESIGN INTENT
Access boundariesSource + version historyHuman governance
Your team owns decisions.

The flow illustrates connections; it does not approve or send a proposal.

  1. Choose your offer.

    Select strategy, an existing-proposal review, connected proposal materials or a recurring workspace.

    Engagement scope

    Strategy / Review / Package / Workspace

    Illustrative workflow
  2. Provide the material.

    Supply the client requirements, documents, constraints and other inputs needed for the offer. Confirm data handling before sharing restricted material. This public example accepts no uploads.

    Prepared source context

    Sample proposal + sample bid requirements

    Illustrative workflow
  3. Review the output.

    Examine the findings or deliverables, their supporting evidence and the questions still unresolved.

    Evidence assessment

    Sample requirements Section 4.2 → FR-001

    Illustrative workflow
  4. Decide and use the work.

    Your team decides which changes to accept, approves its commitments and decides what to share. Suggested wording does not approve itself.

    Release boundary

    Human review → Human approval

    Approval never inferred

BEFORE THE FIRST REVIEW

Set the boundaries
before sharing material.

Confirm hosting, model providers, data use, retention, deletion, access and client separation before restricted documents are shared.

Read the offer workflow in full
HOW STRATUM WORKS

From your source material to work your team can review.

You supply the context, requirements and evidence. Stratum analyzes that material and prepares the findings or deliverables included in your offer. Your team decides what to change, approve and share.

  1. 01

    Choose your offer.

    Select strategy, an existing-proposal review, connected proposal materials or a recurring workspace.

  2. 02

    Provide the material.

    Add the client requirements, documents, constraints and other inputs needed for that offer.

  3. 03

    Review what Stratum produces.

    Examine the findings or deliverables, their supporting evidence and the questions still unresolved.

  4. 04

    Decide and use the work.

    Make the changes your firm accepts, approve the relevant version and download the included outputs.

Compare the offers
Explore the context behind the work
WHAT STRATUM USES

Your context shapes the work.

Start with the context you authorize. Connect it to the evidence and decisions behind the work. Keep the professional in control of the result.

AI models

Reasoning and generation beneath the Stratum workflow.

Your team

Reviews the evidence, resolves open questions, and approves commitments and decides what to share.

An overview of how Stratum is designed to work.

Reuse the standards.
Respect the engagement boundary.

Organizational context

Approved templates, methods, role expectations, and output preferences that are permitted for reuse.

Engagement context

Client facts, transcripts, commercial inputs, requirements, and commitments that belong to the specific pursuit.

Supply only the standards and client material you are authorized to use. Confirm the applicable storage and access controls before sharing restricted information.

Review data and confidentiality

Read about changes and continuity
CONTINUE AS THE PURSUIT CHANGES

Move the work forward
without losing the record.

New information should change the right parts of the work, not erase the basis of the earlier decision.

01

Establish the reference.

Record the six-week pilot, its source material, and the inputs still missing.

02

Examine the new request.

Record the four-week option and the removed specialist. Identify the work that needs review.

03

Preserve what still holds.

Preserve the six-week proposal while capacity and commercial inputs remain unresolved.

This sequence continues the prepared product example.

STRATUM